11. Transition from Hallstatt to La Tène (Ha D3 / Lt A)

Web sources consulted: Pare, “Fürstensitze, Celts and the Mediterranean World,” Proc. Prehistoric Society; CUP, “Phase Transition, Axial Age, and Axis Displacement,” in Eurasia at the Dawn of History; La Tène culture Wikipedia; Hallstatt Culture — World History Encyclopedia.

1. Chronological Framework: Ha D3 and Lt A Overlap

The transition from the Hallstatt to the La Tène cultural system is conventionally placed within the Reinecke phase Ha D3, which overlaps with and grades into Lt A. In absolute terms, Ha D3 spans approximately 480/475–450/430 BC, while Lt A is generally dated to c. 450–390/380 BC, though the boundary is regionally variable and the subject of ongoing refinement. The overlap zone — sometimes termed the “Ha D3/Lt A horizon” — is a period in which Hallstatt-tradition material culture (e.g., certain fibula types, ceramic styles, burial rites) coexists with or is progressively replaced by La Tène innovations (new art styles, different weapon sets, altered settlement hierarchies).

Dendrochronological dates have been critical for anchoring this transition. The Heuneburg (Kr. Sigmaringen, Baden-Württemberg), the best-excavated Fürstensitz, provides a destruction horizon dendro-dated to c. 480 BC for its final phase (Period Ia), marking the violent end of the settlement’s mudbrick-walled acropolis (Gersbach 1989, 1995). At the Hohmichele tumulus near the Heuneburg, secondary burials may extend into the early 5th century. The Grafenbühl barrow near the Hohenasperg (Kr. Ludwigsburg) contains imports datable to c. 480–460 BC, placing it right at the Ha D3/Lt A cusp (Zürn 1970). The Glauberg (Wetterau, Hessen) burials, with their iconic sandstone warrior statues, are securely placed in Lt A, c. 450–400 BC (Herrmann 2002). Radiocarbon dating has generally confirmed the dendro-based framework but with wider error margins that make fine-grained phasing difficult (Pare 1992).

A key chronological debate concerns whether the transition was abrupt or gradual, and whether it occurred simultaneously across the Hallstatt world. Peter Pare (1991, 1992) argued for a relatively rapid transformation concentrated in the decades around 450 BC, driven by disruptions to Mediterranean trade networks. Others, notably Olivier Buchsenschutz and Patrice Brun (1997), have emphasised the regional variability of the transition, with some areas (e.g., the Middle Rhine and Champagne) developing La Tène characteristics earlier than others (e.g., the southeastern Alpine zone, where Hallstatt traditions persisted longer).

2. The Collapse of the Fürstensitze

The most dramatic archaeological signature of the Hallstatt–La Tène transition in the Western Hallstatt zone is the abandonment or destruction of the so-called Fürstensitze (princely seats) — fortified hilltop settlements associated with rich tumulus burials containing Mediterranean imports. The principal sites affected are the Heuneburg, the Hohenasperg, Mont Lassois/Vix (Côte-d’Or, Burgundy), and possibly Bourges (Avaricum, Berry). Their demise between c. 480 and 430 BC marks one of the most consequential socio-political ruptures in European protohistory.

Heuneburg: The settlement on the upper Danube near Hundersingen was occupied from the late Bronze Age through Ha D, reaching its apogee in Ha D1–D2 (c. 620–520 BC) when it featured a unique mudbrick wall on stone foundations — a Mediterranean-inspired construction technique unparalleled north of the Alps (Gersbach 1989). The final occupation phase (Period Ia) ended in a conflagration dendro-dated to c. 480 BC. The site was not reoccupied as a major settlement. The surrounding tumulus landscape (Hohmichele, Gießübel-Talhau, Bettelbühl) produced elite burials with gold, imported Attic pottery, and wagons, but the latest of these belong firmly to Ha D3; no Lt A elite complex succeeded the Heuneburg locally. Excavations by Siegfried Kurz and Dirk Krausse (2000s–2010s) have revealed extensive extramural settlement in the Heuneburg’s immediate environs, suggesting a proto-urban agglomeration of perhaps 5,000 people at its peak — making its collapse all the more significant (Krausse 2010; Fernández-Götz 2014).

Mont Lassois / Vix: The hillfort of Mont Lassois above the Seine controlled a key river crossing and trade route. The famous Vix burial (discovered by René Joffroy in 1953), with its massive bronze krater of Greek manufacture (1.64 m tall, c. 208 kg, capacity ~1,100 litres), is dated to c. 500–480 BC and represents the zenith of the site’s importance. Mont Lassois appears to have declined sharply in the early 5th century; the hillfort shows no significant Lt A occupation. Bruno Chaume’s excavations from the 2000s onward have clarified the settlement’s layout and its Mediterranean architectural elements, including a possible apsidal building with adobe construction (Chaume and Mordant 2011). The site’s decline coincides closely with the Heuneburg’s destruction.

Hohenasperg: This volcanic hill near Ludwigsburg (Baden-Württemberg) is less well known archaeologically because the modern town and fortress overlie the prehistoric remains. However, its surrounding tumuli — the Grafenbühl (c. 480–460 BC) and the Kleinaspergle (c. 450–420 BC) — straddle the Ha D3/Lt A divide. The Kleinaspergle burial, excavated in 1879, contained Attic red-figure pottery (a kylix attributed to a known Athenian workshop, datable c. 450 BC) alongside early La Tène gold work and fibulae (Kimmig 1988). This suggests that at the Hohenasperg, unlike the Heuneburg and Mont Lassois, elite power may have persisted across the transition, though possibly with a change in the ruling lineage or political organisation. The Hohenasperg therefore challenges any simple model of uniform Fürstensitze collapse.

Explanatory Models for the Collapse

Multiple hypotheses have been proposed for why the Fürstensitze system disintegrated:

1. Mediterranean trade disruption: The most widely cited model, advanced by Wolfgang Kimmig (1969, 1983) and elaborated by Peter Pare (1991), links the Fürstensitze’s power to their role as intermediaries in prestige-goods exchange with Greek and Etruscan traders, particularly through the colony of Massalia (modern Marseille, founded c. 600 BC). The argument holds that when trade routes shifted — possibly due to political changes in the Mediterranean (the fall of Etruscan power after the Battle of Cumae in 474 BC, Persian Wars disruptions, changing Greek colonial strategies) — the Hallstatt elites lost their monopoly on exotic imports and thus their basis for prestige and social control. This model has been critiqued for overemphasising Mediterranean agency and underestimating indigenous dynamics (Dietler 1990; Wells 1980).

2. Internal social conflict: Patrice Brun (1987, 1997) proposed a world-systems-inspired model in which Hallstatt elites depended on redistributing prestige goods to maintain hierarchical social relations. When the supply of imports faltered, subordinate elites and communities on the periphery of the Fürstensitze territories could challenge the centre, leading to political fragmentation. This model aligns with the observation that early La Tène elite burials appear in previously peripheral zones (the Middle Rhine, Hunsrück-Eifel, Champagne) rather than in the old Hallstatt core.

3. Demographic and ecological factors: Some scholars have suggested that population growth and environmental degradation (deforestation for fuel and construction, soil exhaustion) may have destabilised the hilltop centres (Wells 1984). However, the palaeoenvironmental evidence remains equivocal, and this model has gained less traction than the trade-disruption and socio-political models.

4. Military conquest or raiding: The destruction layer at the Heuneburg strongly suggests violent attack rather than gradual abandonment. Who the attackers were remains unknown — they could have been rival Hallstatt polities, emerging La Tène groups from the north, or internal factions. The absence of clear archaeological signatures of a conquering group makes this hypothesis difficult to test.

5. Centre–periphery power shift: Manuel Fernández-Götz (2014) and others have framed the transition as a centre–periphery inversion. The old Fürstensitze occupied a “core” zone (the upper Danube–upper Rhine–Saône corridor) that had been dominant in Ha D. In the 5th century, communities on the margins of this zone — in the Middle Rhine, the Marne, and the Hunsrück-Eifel highlands — developed new forms of elite expression (chariot burials, La Tène art) and increasingly bypassed the old centres. This model does not require a single catastrophic cause but instead sees the transition as a structural realignment of power networks.

3. The Emergence of La Tène Culture: Geographic Shifts

The Marne / Champagne Region

The Marne department and the broader Champagne region of northeastern France is one of the earliest and most prolific zones of La Tène culture. The so-called “Marnian” cemeteries — flat inhumation cemeteries with chariot burials (tombes à char) — appear from the late 5th century BC and represent a marked departure from the Hallstatt tumulus tradition. Key cemetery complexes include those around Châlons-en-Champagne, Somme-Bionne, Somme-Tourbe (“La Gorge-Meillet”), Écury-le-Repos, and the Butte de Vert-la-Gravelle. Jean-Jacques Charpy and others have catalogued over 100 chariot burials from this region for the Lt A–B period (Charpy 1991). The Marnian burials feature two-wheeled chariots (as opposed to the four-wheeled wagons of Hallstatt tradition), La Tène-style weaponry (long iron swords, spears), fibulae of La Tène type, and occasionally coral-inlaid bronzework. ⚠️ The relationship between the Marnian chariot-burial tradition and the Hallstatt wagon burials is debated: some scholars see direct evolution (the two-wheeled chariot replacing the four-wheeled wagon as elite vehicle), while others argue for a discontinuity in which the Marnian tradition represents a distinct social group or ethnic element.

The Middle Rhine and Hunsrück-Eifel

The Middle Rhine valley and the adjacent Hunsrück-Eifel uplands (Rhineland-Palatinate) constitute another major nucleus of early La Tène development. The Hunsrück-Eifel culture (HEK), identified and defined by Alfred Haffner (1976), shows a continuous burial record from Ha D through Lt A, with the transition marked by shifts in fibula types, the adoption of La Tène art motifs, and changes in weapon deposition. Key sites include the Hochscheid princely graves and the cemetery at Bescheid. The HEK is significant because it demonstrates that the La Tène transition was not universally a sharp break; in this region, there are strong continuity elements in settlement location, burial rite (tumulus with inhumation), and material culture, even as new stylistic and technological elements were adopted.

The Glauberg

The Glauberg (Wetterau, Hessen), excavated from 1994 under Fritz-Rudolf Herrmann and subsequently by the Keltenwelt am Glauberg museum project, is one of the most spectacular early La Tène elite sites. Two rich burials (Grabhügel 1) contained gold torcs, bronze flagons (Schnabelkannen), weaponry, and other prestige goods datable to c. 450–400 BC. Most remarkably, a near-life-size sandstone statue of a warrior wearing a distinctive “leaf crown” (mistletoe crown?) was found associated with the tumulus — the only known monumental stone sculpture from the early La Tène world (Herrmann 2002; Baitinger and Pinsker 2002). The Glauberg demonstrates that the new La Tène elites could invest in monumental display at a level comparable to the old Fürstensitze, but the site’s location in the Wetterau, well north of the classic Hallstatt core, underscores the geographic shift of elite power.

The Kleinaspergle and Reinheim

The Kleinaspergle burial (near the Hohenasperg, excavated 1879) and the Reinheim burial (Saarland, excavated by Josef Keller in 1954) are two further Lt A elite graves that illuminate the transition. The Kleinaspergle contained two Attic red-figure kylikes (c. 450 BC), a gold openwork drinking-horn mount with early La Tène vegetal ornament, and a bronze Etruscan stamnos, mixing Mediterranean imports with indigenous La Tène art in a single assemblage. The Reinheim burial, that of a woman, contained a spectacular gold torc with human-faced terminals, gold bracelets, an Etruscan bronze jug, amber and glass beads, and over 200 objects in total — establishing that La Tène elite status was not restricted to males with weapons (Echt 1999).

4. Early La Tène Art: Genesis and Character

The emergence of the Early La Tène art style (also known as the “Early Style” or Frühlatènekunst) is one of the defining markers of the cultural transition. Paul Jacobsthal’s foundational study Early Celtic Art (1944) identified the key characteristics: flowing vegetal motifs (palmettes, lotuses, tendrils), S-curves, human and animal faces (often ambiguous or composite — the so-called “Cheshire Cat” faces), and an aesthetic of deliberate ambiguity and visual play. Jacobsthal traced the origins of this style to the creative synthesis of three source traditions: (1) indigenous Hallstatt geometric and animal art, (2) Etruscan motifs transmitted through trade contacts, and (3) Greek (particularly East Greek/Orientalising) ornamental vocabulary. This tripartite origin model remains broadly accepted, though subsequent scholars — notably Venceslas Kruta (1975), Megaw and Megaw (1989, 2001), and more recently Courtney Nimura and colleagues — have refined the picture.

Key objects illustrating the genesis of Early La Tène art include the Erstfeld treasure (gold torcs and bracelets from Uri, Switzerland, c. 400 BC), the Basse-Yutz flagons (bronze and coral-inlaid wine vessels from Lorraine, c. 450 BC, now in the British Museum), the Dürrnberg bei Hallein flagons and belt plates, and the gold drinking-horn terminals from Kleinaspergle. These objects show Mediterranean motifs being absorbed and transformed into a distinctly non-classical aesthetic — what Ruth and Vincent Megaw have called the “creative misunderstanding” of classical art by Celtic craftspeople.

5. The Eastern Hallstatt Zone: Continuity and Divergence

The transition played out differently in the Eastern Hallstatt zone (modern Slovenia, northeastern Italy, western Hungary, eastern Austria, and southern Bohemia). Here, the Hallstatt tradition persisted longer, and the adoption of La Tène material culture was more gradual and selective.

Dürrnberg bei Hallein (Salzburg, Austria) is the critical site for understanding eastern continuity. A major salt-mining centre that succeeded Hallstatt itself in importance during Ha D, the Dürrnberg shows unbroken occupation and salt production from Ha D through Lt A and beyond. Its extensive cemetery (over 350 graves excavated by Ludwig Pauli, Fritz Moosleitner, and subsequently by the Salzburg Museum team) demonstrates a gradual adoption of La Tène material culture — fibulae, art styles, weapon types — without the dramatic rupture seen at the Fürstensitze (Pauli 1978; Moosleitner et al. 1974; Stöllner 2002). The Dürrnberg flagons (bronze beaked jugs with figural handle attachments) exemplify the blending of Hallstatt and La Tène traditions. The site’s continued prosperity through the transition period supports models that link Fürstensitze collapse specifically to the western prestige-goods system rather than to a pan-European crisis.

Závist (Bohemia, Czech Republic) is a large hillfort that was occupied in Ha D and then, after an apparent hiatus, reoccupied and massively expanded in Lt B–C to become one of the largest oppida north of the Alps. The Ha D phase at Závist included evidence of cult activity (a palisaded enclosure interpreted as a sanctuary by Karel Motyková and Petr Drda) and Mediterranean imports. The apparent gap in occupation during Lt A makes Závist a potential parallel to the western Fürstensitze collapse, though the evidence is less clear-cut (Drda and Rybová 1995).

In the southeastern Alpine region, the Certosa horizon (named after the cemetery at Bologna-Certosa) represents a late Ha D / early Lt A phase characterised by specific fibula types (the Certosa fibula) and the continuation of the situla art tradition. The transition here was less about wholesale cultural replacement and more about gradual stylistic and technological evolution within established communities. Sites like Stična and Novo Mesto (both in Dolenjska, Slovenia) show rich burial sequences spanning the late Hallstatt and into the early La Tène period, with the adoption of new fibula types and weapon forms but continuity in burial location and basic ritual structure (Gabrovec 1987; Križ 1997).

6. Mechanisms of Transition: Migration, Diffusion, or Transformation?

The nature of the Hallstatt–La Tène transition has been framed through several theoretical lenses:

Migration models: Older scholarship, influenced by the culture-historical paradigm (Kossinna and successors), interpreted the appearance of La Tène material culture as evidence for the migration of “Celtic” peoples from a Hallstatt homeland. Classical sources — particularly Livy (5.33–35) and Polybius on the Gallic invasions of Italy in the early 4th century BC — were marshalled in support. However, modern archaeology has largely moved away from simple migration explanations for the Ha D/Lt A transition, recognising that the shift in material culture need not imply population replacement. ⚠️ That said, some scholars (e.g., Cunliffe 1997, 2019) continue to argue that significant population movements did occur, particularly into the Marne region and later into Italy and the Carpathian Basin.

Peer-polity interaction and elite emulation: This model, drawing on Colin Renfrew’s peer-polity interaction framework and applied to the Hallstatt–La Tène context by Brun (1987) and others, sees the spread of La Tène art styles, weapon types, and burial rites as the result of competitive emulation among elites, facilitated by networks of exchange, intermarriage, and alliance. In this view, there was no “La Tène people” who expanded; rather, new fashions, technologies, and ideologies spread through existing networks, being adopted and adapted by local communities.

Heterarchy and political reorganisation: Susan Frankenstein and Michael Rowlands (1978) proposed an influential prestige-goods economy model for the Hallstatt period, in which elites maintained power by controlling access to Mediterranean imports. Brun (1987, 1997) extended this into a cyclical model of political centralisation and decentralisation, arguing that the La Tène transition represents a phase of decentralisation following the collapse of the prestige-goods system. More recently, scholars like John Collis (2003) and Manuel Fernández-Götz (2014) have introduced heterarchy — the coexistence of multiple, non-ranked forms of social power — as a more nuanced framework than simple models of rise and collapse.

7. Historical Sources and the Celtic Question

Classical literary sources provide a tantalising but problematic backdrop to the archaeological transition. Herodotus (Histories 2.33, 4.49), writing in the mid-5th century BC, locates the Keltoi near the source of the Danube and beyond the Pillars of Heracles — possibly reflecting knowledge of Hallstatt-period populations. Hecataeus of Miletus (c. 500 BC) places the city of “Nyrax” (possibly the Heuneburg?) in the land of the Keltoi. By the 4th century BC, Greek and Roman sources increasingly associate the Celts with the La Tène cultural sphere, particularly in the context of the Gallic invasions of Italy (Senones’ sack of Rome, traditionally dated 390 BC by Roman sources, c. 387 BC by Polybius).

⚠️ The relationship between the archaeological cultures (Hallstatt, La Tène) and the ethnic/linguistic categories used by classical authors (Keltoi, Galatae, Galli) is deeply contested. Some scholars equate the Hallstatt–La Tène transition with the ethnogenesis or consolidation of Celtic identity (Collis 2003; Karl 2012); others argue that “Celtic” as a meaningful ethnic or cultural category is a modern scholarly construct, or at least that it cannot be straightforwardly mapped onto archaeological culture groups (James 1999). The “Celtic from the West” hypothesis (Cunliffe and Koch 2010) adds further complexity by proposing an Atlantic origin for Celtic languages, which would decouple Celtic linguistic identity from the Hallstatt core zone entirely.

8. Synthesis: A Multi-Causal, Regionally Differentiated Transition

The Hallstatt–La Tène transition is best understood not as a single event but as a complex, multi-causal, and regionally differentiated process spanning roughly a century (c. 500–400 BC). Its key features include:

1. The collapse or transformation of the Fürstensitze system in the western Hallstatt zone, most dramatically at the Heuneburg (destroyed c. 480 BC) and Mont Lassois (abandoned by c. 475 BC), but with possible continuity at the Hohenasperg into the early La Tène period.

2. A geographic shift of elite power away from the upper Danube–upper Rhine–Saône corridor toward the Middle Rhine, the Hunsrück-Eifel, and the Marne/Champagne region, where new forms of elite burial (chariot graves) and new prestige symbols (La Tène art, two-wheeled vehicles) emerged.

3. The development of Early La Tène art as a creative synthesis of Hallstatt, Etruscan, and Greek artistic traditions, expressed in metalwork of extraordinary quality (Basse-Yutz flagons, Erstfeld gold, Glauberg sculpture).

4. Variable trajectories in the Eastern Hallstatt zone, where sites like the Dürrnberg bei Hallein show unbroken continuity across the transition, and the southeastern Alpine communities adopted La Tène elements gradually and selectively.

5. The emergence of new settlement forms, with the old hilltop Fürstensitze giving way — after a gap of several generations in many cases — to the large Late La Tène oppida of Lt C–D, though the relationship between these two settlement forms remains debated.

6. Multiple, interacting causes: disruption of Mediterranean trade networks, internal socio-political dynamics (competition among elites, centre–periphery tensions), possibly some population movements, and the development of new ideological and artistic frameworks that redefined elite identity.

The transition from Hallstatt to La Tène thus represents not so much the “end” of one culture and the “beginning” of another, but a fundamental restructuring of the social, political, economic, and ideological systems of Iron Age temperate Europe — a restructuring whose roots lay within the Hallstatt world itself.

Key Bibliography

• Baitinger, H. and Pinsker, B. (eds.) (2002) Das Rätsel der Kelten vom Glauberg. Stuttgart: Theiss.
• Brun, P. (1987) Princes et Princesses de la Celtique: Le premier Age du Fer en Europe, 850–450 av. J.-C. Paris: Errance.
• Brun, P. (1997) ‘Les résidences princières comme centres territoriaux: un concept à tester’, in P. Brun and B. Chaume (eds.) Vix et les éphémères principautés celtiques. Paris: Errance, pp. 273–280.
• Chaume, B. and Mordant, C. (eds.) (2011) Le complexe aristocratique de Vix: Nouvelles recherches sur l’habitat, le système de fortification et l’environnement du mont Lassois. Dijon: Editions Universitaires de Dijon.
• Collis, J. (2003) The Celts: Origins, Myths and Inventions. Stroud: Tempus.
• Cunliffe, B. (1997) The Ancient Celts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cunliffe, B. and Koch, J. (eds.) (2010) Celtic from the West. Oxford: Oxbow.
• Dietler, M. (1990) ‘Driven by Drink: The Role of Drinking in the Political Economy and the Case of Early Iron Age France’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9, pp. 352–406.
• Drda, P. and Rybová, A. (1995) Les Celtes de Bohême. Paris: Errance.
• Echt, R. (1999) Das Fürstinnengrab von Reinheim. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Altertumskunde.
• Fernández-Götz, M. (2014) Identity and Power: The Transformation of Iron Age Societies in Northeast Gaul. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
• Frankenstein, S. and Rowlands, M.J. (1978) ‘The Internal Structure and Regional Context of Early Iron Age Society in South-Western Germany’, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 15, pp. 73–112.
• Gabrovec, S. (1987) ‘Jugoistočnoalpska regija’, in A. Benac (ed.) Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja V, pp. 25–181.
• Gersbach, E. (1989, 1995) Ausgrabungen an der Heuneburg, vols. I–II. Mainz: von Zabern.
• Haffner, A. (1976) Die westliche Hunsrück-Eifel-Kultur. Berlin: de Gruyter.
• Herrmann, F.-R. (2002) ‘Der Glauberg am Ostrand der Wetterau’, in Baitinger and Pinsker (eds.) Das Rätsel der Kelten, pp. 90–107.
• Jacobsthal, P. (1944) Early Celtic Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• James, S. (1999) The Atlantic Celts: Ancient People or Modern Invention? London: British Museum Press.
• Kimmig, W. (1969) ‘Zum Problem späthallstättischer Adelssitze’, in K.-H. Otto and J. Herrmann (eds.) Siedlung, Burg und Stadt, pp. 95–113.
• Kimmig, W. (1983) Die Heuneburg an der oberen Donau. Stuttgart: Theiss.
• Krausse, D. (2010) ‘“Fürstensitze” and the Early Celtic Centralisation Processes’, in D. Krausse (ed.) “Fürstensitze” und Zentralorte der frühen Kelten, vol. I, pp. 1–26.
• Kruta, V. (1975) L’Art Celtique en Bohême. Paris: Champion.
• Megaw, R. and Megaw, V. (2001) Celtic Art: From its Beginnings to the Book of Kells. Rev. ed. London: Thames & Hudson.
• Moosleitner, F., Pauli, L. and Penninger, E. (1974) Der Dürrnberg bei Hallein II. Munich: Beck.
• Pare, C. (1991) ‘Fürstensitze, Celts and the Mediterranean World: Developments in the West Hallstatt Culture in the 6th and 5th Centuries BC’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 57, pp. 183–202.
• Pare, C. (1992) Wagons and Wagon-Graves of the Early Iron Age in Central Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology.
• Pauli, L. (1978) Der Dürrnberg bei Hallein III. Munich: Beck.
• Stöllner, T. (2002) ‘Der Dürrnberg bei Hallein’, in Die Kelten in Mitteleuropa, pp. 156–178.
• Wells, P.S. (1980) Culture Contact and Culture Change: Early Iron Age Central Europe and the Mediterranean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Wells, P.S. (1984) Farms, Villages, and Cities: Commerce and Urban Origins in Late Prehistoric Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
• Zürn, H. (1970) Hallstattforschungen in Nordwürttemberg. Stuttgart: Müller und Gräff.